CSI stands for Container Storage Interface. It is an initiative to combine the storage interface of Container Orchestrator Systems(COS) such as Mesos, Kubernetes, Docker Swarm, etc. with storage vendors like Ceph, Net App (Network Appliance Inc. is a hybrid cloud data services and data management Company.), etc. This means Implementing a single CSI for storage vendors, which definitely with all COS. Kubernetes 1.9 introduces an alpha implementation of the Container Storage Interface, which makes installing new volume plugins easy. Before Kubernetes 1.9, we need to add to the core Kubernetes codebase for third-party storage providers to develop solutions, but after Kubernetes 1.9 third-party storage providers to develop solutions without the need of adding core Kubernetes codebase. At present, the CSI 0.2 version was introduced in March 2018.
Essential Terminologies related to Container Storage Interface (CSI)
- COS – Container Orchestrator Systems is all about managing the life cycle of Containers, especially in large dynamic environments. It is used to control and automate many tasks by software teams.
- Volume – A unit of space that will be made available inside of managed containers via the CSI.
- Node – A host where a workload will be running.
- Workload – The atomic unit of “work” anticipated by a COS.
- Plugin – Plugin points to a service that exposes gRPC endpoints.
- gRPC – It is an open-source Remote Procedure Call System initially developed at Google.
- SP – Storage Provider, the vendor of CSI plugin implementation.
Container Storage Interface Goals
- Interoperability – The storage vendor can build once a plugin, and that plugin can be used by all the CO that support CSI.
- Vendor-neutral – Any CO and storage provider should not terminate it.
- Focus on specification
- Control plane only
Before Container Storage Interface (CSI)
Before CSI was introduced, different COS have their interface that the storage vendor has to implement so that the COS can talk to that SP during the life cycle of volume. The First release of the CSI version 0.1 was introduced in December 2017. In the case of Kubernetes, volume plugins were serving the storage need for container workload.
The first problem was in Kubernetes itself, you need to write a driver as a source vendor and put it inside the Kubernetes code, and what that meant is that as a storage vendor you could not one fix any issues, which you have to wait for Kubernetes release you are bound for release process of Kubernetes.
What happens is that each one of this COS would then design their method and say: “This is our API.” So as a storage product as a storage system, you have to write drivers for three different systems (Mesos, Kubernetes, Docker Swarm).
Developers who developed plugins are forced to make plugin source code available.
Object Storage – Object storage also called object-based storage. Which describes an approach to addressing and manipulating discrete units of storage called objects like files objects contain data, but unlike files, objects are not organized in a hierarchy that means every object exists at the same level in a flat address space called the storage pool and one object can not be placed inside another object. An object is designed for unstructured data such as media, documents, logs, backup, etc. The most popular cloud object storage is AWS S3. Useful for automating and streamlining data storage.
Use cases –
- Storage for unstructured data like music, image, etc.
- Storage for backup files, log files.
- Hybrid cloud storage.
- Disaster Recovery.
Benefits of object storage
- Scalability: Adding data forever, there is no limit. Security and compliance
- Flexible management
Drawbacks – They are designed to read and write entire files, not for a small piece of files. It can not guarantee that each request will always get the latest version of the file that means if any application updates, its not necessary that all the locations where application installed get notification regarding the update.
Block Storage – This kind of storage system is usually located close to the server in the same data center, and it organizes data in separate volumes, accessed by one or very few servers simultaneously. The volume has the layout of local hard-disks, presented in the form of sectors and tracks. Most common access protocols are FC and iSCSI, and all of the communication happens on a dedicated Storage area network based on lossless Ethernet or FC equipment. This type of storage is perfect for databases and virtual machines, and more in general for all those workloads that require low latency and high IOPS. Unfortunately, Block storage systems are also characterized by a very high cost per gigabyte, and most of the implementations in the market still rely on scale-up dual-controller designs, with a total capacity that can hardly reach the petabyte level, while maintaining a right performance consistency.
Use cases –
- Structured database storage.
- Application using server-side processing.
Drawbacks – The limited scalability drives up complexity and costs in large-capacity scenarios. That means complex to manage at scale.
Before CSI, all COS had their way to handle storage. Docker has DVDI, kubernetes has flex volume. These implementations have their design criteria, since compatible APIs, applications with various degrees of reliability and quality.
Problem with current interfaces are as follows –
- CLI based interface
- Lack of idempotency on APIs
- In-tree interface
Three core RPC Services –
- Identity Services
- Controller Services
- Node Services
Identity Services – Identity Services gives basic information about plugins like what is your name? What are your capabilities? And we are going to probe you and to see is you are healthy or not, and if every single plug-in needs to implement these three costs, it’s original cost
- GetPluginInfo() – This method returns the name and version of the plugin.
- GetPluginCapabilities() – It returns the capabilities of the plugin. If this method returns the capability of the plugin, then CO calls the Controller method.
- Probe() – This is called by CO to check plugin is running or not.
Controller Services – Controller Services are responsible for controlling and managing the volumes, such as: creating, deleting, mount, unmount, and create snapshots, etc.
NodeStageVolume – This method is called by the CO to mount the volume to a path temporarily. But in Kubernetes, two steps mount need in. First, it’s mount to the global directory then it into the pod directory because, in kubernetes, a single volume is used by multiple pods.
Volume Life Cycle Container Orchestrator
Initially, the volume is not created CO (Container Orchestrator) will dynamically provision the amount by using Create Volume and now the amount is in create state and then before the size can be used by a container on a node the CO will call ControllerPublishVolume to make an amount available on some required node. Once the ControllerPublish is successful, the CO calls the NodeStageVolume, which the operation for each volume on a node and then calls NodePublishVolume for each part.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do I choose a trustworthy app development company?Here are a few things to remember to choose a reliable mobile app development partner:
- Choose a partner that cares about its clients.
- Never compromise on technology experience and domain expertise.
- Check out your development partners’ portfolios, customer testimonials, and references.
- Observe how they approach communication and how much they pay attention to your vision.
- Ask the right questions to help you choose easily.
Why is India preferred for app development outsourcing worldwide?Here are a few reasons why India is one of the preferred outsourcing destinations:
- The average outsourcing charges in India are $18 – $40, which is way more affordable than in developed countries like the USA, $38 – $63.
- India has a large pool of native-English speakers who’re highly proficient in their work.
- With an Indian outsourcing partner, you can access 24×7 support and specialized IT talent.
How much time does it take to develop an app?Depending on the complexity of a mobile app, it can take several weeks to several months to develop it. An app like Uber takes around 1200 hours to develop. On the other hand, a dating app like Tinder can be developed in 1000 hours.
Freelancers vs. app development company – which one is better?Pricing-wise, freelancers appear to be more affordable. However, they offer no accountability for your mobile app. You can’t hold them accountable if the app doesn’t turn out to be as expected. On the other hand, an app development agency takes complete responsibility for your mobile app. Hence, an app development agency is better than a freelancer.
Do you have an exciting mobile app idea in mind?
We can help you build a mobile app on an affordable budget. Contact us!